Open development/Why the closed packages

Revision as of 15:55, 4 October 2008

Open source is the licensing model preferred by Nokia in the development of Maemo. There are some reasons to have exceptions, though:

- Brand: Nokia wants to keep a strong brand and identity avoiding any risks of dilution.

- Differentiation: Nokia wants to gain competitive advantage in certain areas by keeping the related software closed.

- Legacy: Nokia keeps some components minimally maintained - the work of opening them has an unclear outcome.

- IPR & licensing issues: Nokia avoids serious risks brought by patents, copyrights or complicated licensing situations.

- Third party: Nokia does not own the code and therefore does not decide on the license.

If you want to know the specific reasons for a package to be closed please list it below.

Andre: Adding the four requests that we have in Bugzilla:

Alarm framework is open source, but apparently the sources are lost/missing as explained in the bug.

Revision as of 15:49, 4 October 2008 (edit) qgil (Talk \| contribs) (→Specific reasons for packages) ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:55, 4 October 2008 (edit) (undo) qgil (Talk \| contribs) m (→Opened) Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	== Opened ==		== Opened ==
-	* [https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3635 Alarm framework] is open source, but apparently the sources a lost/missing as explained in the bug.	+	* [https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3635 Alarm framework] is open source, but apparently the sources are lost/missing as explained in the bug.