QA meeting

Line 11: Line 11:
'''Agenda'''
'''Agenda'''
-
  * QA is good.
+
* QA is good.
-
  * The criteria are a good start, but need tweaks  
+
* The criteria are a good start, but need tweaks  
-
  * The packages UI needs some streamlining for testers.
+
* The packages UI needs some streamlining for testers.
-
  * As a tester, a better reminder of the checklist when checking
+
* As a tester, a better reminder of the checklist when checking
     would be good. I also like the ease with which I can give feedback.
     would be good. I also like the ease with which I can give feedback.
-
  * As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with
+
* As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with
     "release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new
     "release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new
     small features (i.e. karma resets to zero).
     small features (i.e. karma resets to zero).
-
* We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero.
+
* We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero.

Revision as of 19:05, 4 November 2009

QA Meeting Agenda

Please place the things you wish to discuss at the QA meeting on IRC below.

Meeting details

  • IRC: irc.freenode.org
  • Channel: #maemo-meeting
  • Time: Tuesday, November 10th, 14:30 UTC

Agenda

  • QA is good.
  • The criteria are a good start, but need tweaks
  • The packages UI needs some streamlining for testers.
  • As a tester, a better reminder of the checklist when checking
   would be good. I also like the ease with which I can give feedback.
  • As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with
   "release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new
   small features (i.e. karma resets to zero).
  • We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero.