QA meeting

Line 17: Line 17:
* As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with "release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new small features.
* As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with "release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new small features.
* We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero.
* We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero.
 +
* Discuss the possibility of PPAs or personal repositories.

Revision as of 17:06, 5 November 2009

QA Meeting Agenda

Please place the things you wish to discuss at the QA meeting on IRC below.

Meeting details

  • IRC: irc.freenode.org
  • Channel: #maemo-meeting
  • Time: Tuesday, November 10th, 14:30 UTC

Agenda

  • QA is good.
  • The criteria are a good start, but need tweaks
  • The packages UI needs some streamlining for testers.
  • As a tester, a better reminder of the checklist when checking would be good. I also like the ease with which I can give feedback.
  • As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with "release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new small features.
  • We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero.
  • Discuss the possibility of PPAs or personal repositories.