Talk:Task:Components and packages

(zwtkbdhh: new section)
m (Reverted edits by 180.210.177.210 (Talk) to last revision by sixwheeledbeast)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
* Is it worth listing the specific licenses of each open source package? It's mostly a manual work...
* Is it worth listing the specific licenses of each open source package? It's mostly a manual work...
** Not requikred, as agreed yesterday in the Sprint3 planning meeting.--[[User:qgil|qgil]] 07:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
** Not requikred, as agreed yesterday in the Sprint3 planning meeting.--[[User:qgil|qgil]] 07:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
-
 
-
== zwtkbdhh ==
 
-
 
-
payday loans direct lender <a href="https://cashnow.cars">payday loan companies</a> loan online instant <a href=https://cashnow.cars>lender</a>
 

Latest revision as of 10:27, 10 August 2018

[edit] ToDo

The current version satisfies the core mission of this task. However, there is some work that could be done to improve it. Tha raw data is available so anybody can continue the work.

  • Better organization of packages. Ideally there would be a basic overview of the areas of the platform, a second level with the specific software components of each area and a third level listing the packages under a component.
  • Nicer presentation of graphics and data in the spreadsheet.
  • Export the data to HTML or PDF for easier access.


  • Introduce approximate lines of code or size of each package to have a better view of the dimensions of each packages and the open/closed relation in a more accurate way. Now operator-wizard appears just as big as the whole Linux Kernel.
    • Done. Just missing some packages.--qgil 07:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Is it worth listing the specific licenses of each open source package? It's mostly a manual work...
    • Not requikred, as agreed yesterday in the Sprint3 planning meeting.--qgil 07:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)