Talk:Task:Maemo Community distribution

(Busybox)
Line 2: Line 2:
Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2008-August/034643.html discussed] in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --[[User:benson|benson]] 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2008-August/034643.html discussed] in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --[[User:benson|benson]] 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Nokia binaries ==
 +
 +
mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though.

Revision as of 06:24, 3 October 2008

Busybox

Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as discussed in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --benson 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Nokia binaries

mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though.