User talk:Peterschneider

(Considerations on wording: new section)
 
(18 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
== Image quality ==
+
Hi Peter,
-
It seems a lot of the images are rather heavily compressed jpegs, which impacts the readability of their content and generally gives an amateurish feel to the introduction pages. Moving to a better compression type for these infographics would help a lot. Perhaps png or even gif ([[:Image:MaemoArchitecture.jpg]] is a good candidate for gif) would help improve readability. Also, captions for the images really shouldn't be included in the images themselves, as it impacts readability for most people and especially for people using screen readers. —[[User:generalantilles|GeneralAntilles]] 12:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:Yes, the final images will be optimized for web.--[[User:qgil|qgil]] 20:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
== Subsections in the navigation bar ==
+
-
Proposal for titles of the subsections in the navigation bar:
+
-
*[[User:Peterschneider|Overview]]
+
-
*[[User:Peterschneider/community_overview|Community]]
+
-
*[[Share apps|Applications]]
+
-
*[[User:Peterschneider/maemo software|Platform]]
+
-
*[[User:Peterschneider/develop overview|Development]]
+
-
*[[User:Peterschneider/maemo_software#Evolution_of_Maemo_Software|History]]
+
-
== Purpose? ==
+
I read some of your comments on the logo shortlist page. Is it out of place to respond and motivate why things are done the way they are?
-
Is this a proposal for a maemo.org frontpage, a wiki frontpage or a front-page for a hypothetical maemo.com?
+
Thanks,
-
Or is this an "About Maemo" page? If this is intended for the frontpage of any website, I'm afraid it's *way* too text heavy for any form of introduction; and the only graphic seems to feature a whole load of projects that most people (and, probably, many developers) won't have heard of. If you've never done multimedia development on GNOME, will you have any real clue what GStreamer is and why it's a good thing? --[[Special:Contributions/127.0.0.1|127.0.0.1]] 20:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
+
--[[User:jussi|jussi]] 11:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
-
== Considerations on wording ==
+
The artists view and story behind the work is always appreciated. --[[User:peterschneider|peterschneider]] 04:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
-
 
+
-
I did some changes on wording but I left these for discussion, just in case.
+
-
 
+
-
There are a couple of terms in these pages that look a bit unusual in open source projects:
+
-
* ''Consumers'' --> Users
+
-
* ''Innovate'', ''Innovation'' --> Develop, Development.
+
-
 
+
-
Also, this sounds a bit too overoptimistic:
+
-
* "over 12.000 registered members that contribute to more than 600 development projects" --> "over 12.000 contributors and more than 600 development projects".
+
-
--[[User:qgil|qgil]] 21:02, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
+

Latest revision as of 04:37, 31 July 2008

Hi Peter,

I read some of your comments on the logo shortlist page. Is it out of place to respond and motivate why things are done the way they are?

Thanks,

--jussi 11:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

The artists view and story behind the work is always appreciated. --peterschneider 04:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)