Talk:Extras-testing

(→телеинспекция трубопроводов стоимость работ: new section)
m (Protected "Talk:Extras-testing": Excessive vandalism ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)))
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
========== end original post ==========
========== end original post ==========
--[[User:joerg_rw|joerg_rw]] 10:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
--[[User:joerg_rw|joerg_rw]] 10:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
-
 
-
== телеинспекция трубопроводов стоимость работ ==
 
-
 
-
Большинство из скважин по окончании осуществления восстановительного комплекса событий позволят быть снова введены в использование. Тем более что суммарная стоимость подобных выполненных работ в десятки раз ниже общей стоимости самих сооружений.
 
-
Обеспечено повышение дебита водозаборной скважины не менее тридцати процентовЫ от имеющегося на момент начала действий.
 
-
 
-
В 80% случаях скважины возобновляются до начальных данных при внедрении в текущую эксплуатацию скважины, что по праву является альтернативой бурения новой скважины.
 
-
 
-
Сотрудники нашей корпорация по Очистке уличной канализации и Очистке водозаборных скважин предлагаем свои услуги всем, как частным так и общественным учреждениям.
 
-
 
-
 
-
SpecVodService  - [url=https://svs-samara.ru/skvazhiny/remont-vodozabornyh-skvazhin/]управление ремонта скважин[/url]
 

Latest revision as of 08:37, 14 February 2018

Comments from TeroK moved to Talk:Extras-testing/QA Checklist

- As far as 'process tracing' and other process measurements by users, we ought to describe how one does this, at least give an idea of what tools are involved. (Jeremiah)

A lot is needed to move to Help testing software -article and make this and that synchronized so that there is no overlapping etc. --ossipena 07:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


Following comment moved from main page to here. Please consider that a wiki is no forum, and deleting huge passages of correct and informative text just to dump a rant without even any signature to show who's the author... that's not how a wiki should get used! A note to anonymous original author of that rant: Nokia won't probably read this wiki, and actually has dropped maemo at large, since quite some time now - just in case you didn't notice. So, considering these facts, please ponder what's the information you provided to your co-customers/users and if you maybe should choose a better channel than this wiki to let Nokia know about your feelings. Tip: Nokia Care

==== original post ====
 l find it unbelievable that you would knlignwoy fragment the installed base by not providing an update to 770. Not only are you letting the owners, your early adopters down, which is bad in itself, but screwing third party developers by doubling build-, test- and distribution workload is no way to build trust for the platform. Frankly, it shows Nokia has a few things to learn about the difference between closed and open systems.
==== end original post ====

--joerg_rw 10:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.maemo.org/Talk:Extras-testing"