Talk:Task:Maemo Community distribution
(Busybox) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2008-August/034643.html discussed] in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --[[User:benson|benson]] 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2008-August/034643.html discussed] in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --[[User:benson|benson]] 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Nokia binaries == | ||
| + | |||
| + | mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though. | ||
Revision as of 06:24, 3 October 2008
Busybox
Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as discussed in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --benson 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Nokia binaries
mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though.