Task:Bugzilla report card
 |
This task is in the list of maemo.org development proposals, please help planning and getting it ready for a sprint. Put a note on the talk page if you're interested in helping work on this task. Please see the talk page for discussion. |
 |
Something that would help in the Fremantle timeline is to define what products (aka which teams) are doing better and worse. Now there is an overall complaint, which is unfair to actually those individuals and teams that are doing a good work in bugs.maemo.org. The general complaint is also more difficult for us to chase reasons why things are how they are. If instead there would be a wiki page or something showing "red - yellow - green - star" status of each product matching a team, then we all would be able to focus on the right spots.– Quim Gil
[edit] Metrics
Grading is based on response rate (how many incoming bugs were responded to?), fix rate (excluding moreinfo, DUPLICATE, WORKSFORME, and INVALID), and (Bugsquad?) perception based on experience with the team.
[edit] Report format
NOTE: This table is entirely bogus.
| Team | Response | Fix | Rating | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Browser | 23/34 | 10/29 | Good | Good response rate, but fixes are slow. |
| Desktop | 2/19 | 12/15 | Yellow | Excellent fix rate, but communication is sorely lacking. |
| Connectivity | 5/25 | 2/25 | Poor | Poor fix rate and poor communication leaves a lot to be desired. |
Utilities  | 10/10 | 5/5 | Excellent! | Perfect response rate, perfect fix rate (excluding moreinfo bugs). |
- This page was last modified on 20 November 2008, at 12:04.
- This page has been accessed 9,901 times.