Talk:Meta:Anonymous editing
(CAPTCHA) |
(just say no) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
lcuk on #maemo had an interesting idea, NIT-based CAPTCHA questions (i.e. What is the codename for Maemo 4.0? Chinook). Of course a regular CAPTCHA system should work fine, but this'd be a nice touch. The CAPTCHA has the nice effect of both not entirely preventing anonymous edits, while hopefully stopping the bots. This should probably come with a strong suggestion for the user to register. —[[User:generalantilles|GeneralAntilles]] 15:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | lcuk on #maemo had an interesting idea, NIT-based CAPTCHA questions (i.e. What is the codename for Maemo 4.0? Chinook). Of course a regular CAPTCHA system should work fine, but this'd be a nice touch. The CAPTCHA has the nice effect of both not entirely preventing anonymous edits, while hopefully stopping the bots. This should probably come with a strong suggestion for the user to register. —[[User:generalantilles|GeneralAntilles]] 15:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Just Say No == | ||
| + | I vote no for anonymous edits.<br> | ||
| + | I freely admit that I want to raise the bar for editing information on a source I would like to consider 'reference'.<br> | ||
| + | [[User:lbt|lbt]] 16:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:23, 21 June 2008
CAPTCHA
lcuk on #maemo had an interesting idea, NIT-based CAPTCHA questions (i.e. What is the codename for Maemo 4.0? Chinook). Of course a regular CAPTCHA system should work fine, but this'd be a nice touch. The CAPTCHA has the nice effect of both not entirely preventing anonymous edits, while hopefully stopping the bots. This should probably come with a strong suggestion for the user to register. —GeneralAntilles 15:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Just Say No
I vote no for anonymous edits.
I freely admit that I want to raise the bar for editing information on a source I would like to consider 'reference'.
lbt 16:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)