Talk:Task:Remarkable community projects
m (→Thread in Internet Tablet Talk) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Thread in Internet Tablet Talk == | == Thread in Internet Tablet Talk == | ||
| - | See also the interesting discussion at [ | + | See also the interesting discussion at [http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21334 Listing the remarkable projects around Maemo] --[[User:qgil|qgil]] 05:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC) |
== Alpha Applications == | == Alpha Applications == | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 3 July 2008
Contents |
Category Distinctions
Clarification on the criteria for distinguishing between categories would be very helpful; while the difference of "Born for Maemo" and "Very Nice Ports" is plain, the exact distinction of "Outstanding Utilities" is unclear. benson 17:41, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Don't you think I have it clear myself. :) At the beginnign the intend was clear: a home applet doing a single task belongs to a different category than a full featured application. However, the line is definitely grey. Proposals for improvement are welcome! --qgil 22:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Thread in Internet Tablet Talk
See also the interesting discussion at Listing the remarkable projects around Maemo --qgil 05:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Alpha Applications
Beeing the developer of WeightJinni I was coaxed that it was named on this web page. However I was suprized that it was claimed to be alpha. I think it was initialy labeled "alpha" on downloads but since there was one person that used it every day over some months and found it stable and useable ( 5 Kg :-)) it was raised to "stable" a while ago. So was this labeled because of crashed or missing features? Please contact me! --framstag 06:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- The "(still in alpha)" was written by the guy who listed your app. The Downloads page says "not yet well tested beta" and "Stable Quality". "1 vote - 280 downloads" doesn't tell much also about the feedback level. So perhaps you need to clarify things a bit when promoting your app so your users get the picture right. :) fyi I haven't tested the app myself, nor I pretend to test all the apps proposed at this point. This needs to be a community effort as well at some point. Thanks for the interest! --qgil 09:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Not in Extras
mYTube was in extras, don't know what happened. Maybe the developer can shed some light. bundyo 07:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Not in Nokia's interest maybe? (Just speculating..)
- Are you kidding? Asking the developer takes as much time as speculating in such a senseless way.--qgil 19:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- I think it's in Nokia interest, not at the contrary. The developer ask about her problem here, and I pointed her to the bugzilla, but it never happened. Probably, the package was automatically deleted because it was uploaded to a bad place in the repository. --yerga 21:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)