QA meeting
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* The criteria are a good start, but need tweaks | * The criteria are a good start, but need tweaks | ||
* The packages UI needs some streamlining for testers. | * The packages UI needs some streamlining for testers. | ||
| - | * As a tester, a better reminder of the checklist when checking | + | * As a tester, a better reminder of the checklist when checking would be good. I also like the ease with which I can give feedback. |
| - | + | * As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with "release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new small features. | |
| - | * As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
* We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero. | * We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero. | ||
Revision as of 19:06, 4 November 2009
QA Meeting Agenda
Please place the things you wish to discuss at the QA meeting on IRC below.
Meeting details
- IRC: irc.freenode.org
- Channel: #maemo-meeting
- Time: Tuesday, November 10th, 14:30 UTC
Agenda
- QA is good.
- The criteria are a good start, but need tweaks
- The packages UI needs some streamlining for testers.
- As a tester, a better reminder of the checklist when checking would be good. I also like the ease with which I can give feedback.
- As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with "release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new small features.
- We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero.