QA meeting
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
'''Agenda''' | '''Agenda''' | ||
| - | + | * QA is good. | |
| - | + | * The criteria are a good start, but need tweaks | |
| - | + | * The packages UI needs some streamlining for testers. | |
| - | + | * As a tester, a better reminder of the checklist when checking | |
would be good. I also like the ease with which I can give feedback. | would be good. I also like the ease with which I can give feedback. | ||
| - | + | * As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with | |
"release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new | "release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new | ||
small features (i.e. karma resets to zero). | small features (i.e. karma resets to zero). | ||
| - | + | * We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero. | |
Revision as of 19:05, 4 November 2009
QA Meeting Agenda
Please place the things you wish to discuss at the QA meeting on IRC below.
Meeting details
- IRC: irc.freenode.org
- Channel: #maemo-meeting
- Time: Tuesday, November 10th, 14:30 UTC
Agenda
- QA is good.
- The criteria are a good start, but need tweaks
- The packages UI needs some streamlining for testers.
- As a tester, a better reminder of the checklist when checking
would be good. I also like the ease with which I can give feedback.
- As a developer, I don't *think* I want to be constrained with
"release early, release often" when fixing bugs or introducing new small features (i.e. karma resets to zero).
- We need a mechanism to preserve karma or reset it to zero.