Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
- | __FORCETOC__
| + | this is a conversation which occured on #maemo Monday 28th September |
- | this is a conversation which occured on #maemo Monday 28th September 2009 | + | |
| It principally involves users ab and astorm discussing implementation specifics for MMS on the n900. | | It principally involves users ab and astorm discussing implementation specifics for MMS on the n900. |
| | | |
Line 12: |
Line 11: |
| Please help by cleaning up this conversation into the specifics and possibly attempt to writeup a proposal based on some of the points discussed here. | | Please help by cleaning up this conversation into the specifics and possibly attempt to writeup a proposal based on some of the points discussed here. |
| | | |
- | Attempt of write up is at [[MMS implementation]]
| |
| | | |
- | ==Problem Definition==
| |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
Line 104: |
Line 101: |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| | | |
- | ==Technical==
| + | Technical: |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
Line 216: |
Line 213: |
| <ab> would be good to have a write up so that I can further point internal guys to this proposal | | <ab> would be good to have a write up so that I can further point internal guys to this proposal |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
- |
| |
- | == Higher level technical ==
| |
- |
| |
- | <pre>
| |
- | [22:17:15] <frals> hmm, when ur on 3G, you got one voice and one data connection right? couldnt you get that to be dual data?
| |
- | [22:17:24] <frals> <- 3g/gsm noob ;)
| |
- | [22:18:08] <lcuk> frals, i dunno
| |
- | [22:18:14] <lcuk> its just automatic mumbo jumbo
| |
- | [22:19:00] <lcuk> qwerty12_N810 to placate some might be an idea to actually indicate in the initial posting of your that it was later sorted ;)
| |
- | [22:20:14] <javispedro> frals: I dunno about 3G, but I read somewhere that MMS requires an extra inet connection.
| |
- | [22:20:29] <lcuk> ahhh well
| |
- | [22:20:31] <frals> yeah it requires you to connect to a specific APN to get the MMS
| |
- | [22:20:34] <javispedro> s/inet/net
| |
- | [22:20:44] <frals> or rather, most operator requires that afaik
| |
- | [22:20:54] <javispedro> frals: well, icd2 is supposed to be able to handle that :S
| |
- | [22:21:31] <javispedro> (the nit internet connectivity daemon, in case you're wondering)
| |
- | [22:22:15] <frals> yeah was looking at that yesterday, from what i gathered it required user confirmation when starting a new connection, which would be annoying when auto fetching an mms
| |
- | [22:22:33] <frals> on the other hand im sure i dont have the whole picture and it can be circumvented somehow ;)
| |
- | [22:22:46] <ShadowJK> i'd think you'd be able to set it no-confirm
| |
- | [22:22:54] <javispedro> frals: not sure. apps can open wi-fi without any dialog if an existing AP is found
| |
- | [22:23:17] <javispedro> considering we could have control of the plugin and thus be able to decide that, I'd guess we'd be able to bypass confirmation.
| |
- | [22:23:29] <frals> ye - but does that setting apply to just the one connection or systemwide..
| |
- | [22:23:37] <frals> ah good point javispedro
| |
- | [22:24:54] <javispedro> (either way, the mms not necessarily has to be managed by icd2, and you may have worse kernel problems to resolve)
| |
- | [22:25:30] <lcuk> frals, javispedro make sure the important bits of your dialog goes onto the wiki page
| |
- | [22:25:59] <javispedro> don't consider my word authoritave, it am not a icd2 dev ;)
| |
- | [22:26:45] <lcuk> javispedro, your word is good as a counterpoint to a conversation, even if you dont know it exactly it helps to make the right sounds
| |
- | [22:29:16] <javispedro> frals: and apps can request for a certain IAP to be activated, thus mms apps could request the mms iap to be activated.
| |
- | http://maemo.org/api_refs/5.0/beta/icd2/group__dbus__api.html#g2d518bd08002c0a8a92c8ba00546360f
| |
- | </pre>
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Category:Tasks]]
| |