Talk:Task:Remarkable community projects

(Thread in Internet Tablet Talk: new section)
Line 7: Line 7:
See also the interesting discussion at [Listing the remarkable projects around Maemo http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21334] --[[User:qgil|qgil]] 05:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
See also the interesting discussion at [Listing the remarkable projects around Maemo http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21334] --[[User:qgil|qgil]] 05:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Alpha Applications ==
 +
Beeing the developer of WeightJinni I was coaxed that it was named on this web page. However I was suprized that it was claimed to be alpha. I think it was initialy labeled "alpha" on downloads but since there was one person that used it every day over some months and found it stable and useable ( 5 Kg :-)) it was raised to "stable" a while ago. So was this labeled because of crashed or missing features? Please contact me! --[[User:framstag|framstag]] 06:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:09, 2 July 2008

Category Distinctions

Clarification on the criteria for distinguishing between categories would be very helpful; while the difference of "Born for Maemo" and "Very Nice Ports" is plain, the exact distinction of "Outstanding Utilities" is unclear. benson 17:41, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Don't you think I have it clear myself.  :) At the beginnign the intend was clear: a home applet doing a single task belongs to a different category than a full featured application. However, the line is definitely grey. Proposals for improvement are welcome! --qgil 22:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Thread in Internet Tablet Talk

See also the interesting discussion at [Listing the remarkable projects around Maemo http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21334] --qgil 05:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Alpha Applications

Beeing the developer of WeightJinni I was coaxed that it was named on this web page. However I was suprized that it was claimed to be alpha. I think it was initialy labeled "alpha" on downloads but since there was one person that used it every day over some months and found it stable and useable ( 5 Kg :-)) it was raised to "stable" a while ago. So was this labeled because of crashed or missing features? Please contact me! --framstag 06:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)