Editing Talk:Task:Maemo.org facelift

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Learn more about Contributing to the wiki.

For issues regarding content and structure on the maemo.org [[Task:Improving_maemo.org#Maemo.org_Homepage_refresh|homepage]] (as well as other pages), please go [[Task:Improving_maemo.org]] and its [[Task:Improving_maemo.org|discussion page]].

== Improving the current layout ==
Layout = graphics and mostly what can be controlled with the CSS styles.

=== What's wrong about the current maemo.org layout? ===
'''List issues here:'''
* Navigation is a little hard to...navigate.
** Certain user-centered items should be prevalent and easy to use (e.g., Downloads, News, Documentation).
*** Downloads page(s) could be better organized (takes notes from user-centered software sites like [http://www.versiontracker.com VersionTracker.com], or even something [http://www.mp3.com completely non-software-related]).
** A lot of the subnav stuff (Roadmap, Lists, Bugzilla, SDK, IRC, etc.) could be removed from the main page and placed in a Developer-centric page.
* As discussed [[Talk:Task:Improving_maemo.org/community#Where_to_get_dynamic_content_from|here]], should the main page be more of an aggregated community-driven content portal?
* Many graphical elements are blurry. Is this a post-process issue, or is it inherent in the original artwork?
* Not very usable on Maemo compatible devices. Even less with thumbs only.

=== What works about the current maemo.org layout? ===
'''List positive remarks here:'''
* Here

=== Proposals for creating a great maemo.org layout. ===
'''List proposals here:'''
* New color in [http://maemo.org/news/announcements/view/logo_contest_results.html new maemo.org logo] should be used.
* Make it a fluid layout.
* Make it more ajaxy. Use [http://jquery.org jQuery] or [http://www.prototypejs.org Prototype] (or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ajax_frameworks something]) to create a clean, snappy UX.
* Very finger usable in Maemo compatible devices.--[[User:qgil|qgil]] 20:33, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
* Specific layout for Maemo compatible devices Y/N? See the [http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=209927&postcount=6 ITt discussion].
* The author/team of the winning logo should be invited to work on the redesign.
* Less text only links and more icons in homepage and navigation. See [http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=209927&postcount=6 allameswerout suggestions in ITt].

Please note that all contributions to maemo.org wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see maemo.org wiki:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Summary:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.maemo.org/Talk:Task:Maemo.org_facelift"

Personal tools

Navigation

Views

Editing Talk:Task:Maemo.org facelift

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 === What's wrong about the current maemo.org layout? ===
 '''List issues here:'''
+* Navigation is a little hard to...navigate.
+** Certain user-centered items should be prevalent and easy to use (e.g., Downloads, News, Documentation).
+*** Downloads page(s) could be better organized (takes notes from user-centered software sites like [http://www.versiontracker.com VersionTracker.com], or even something [http://www.mp3.com completely non-software-related]).
+** A lot of the subnav stuff (Roadmap, Lists, Bugzilla, SDK, IRC, etc.) could be removed from the main page and placed in a Developer-centric page.
+* As discussed [[Talk:Task:Improving_maemo.org/community#Where_to_get_dynamic_content_from|here]], should the main page be more of an aggregated community-driven content portal?
 * Many graphical elements are blurry. Is this a post-process issue, or is it inherent in the original artwork?
 * Not very usable on Maemo compatible devices. Even less with thumbs only.